Thursday, February 2, 2012

I Got a Reply!

So I did end up receiving a reply from my Op-ed editor recently! here it is
Rebecca:

You are probably starting college right now, and have absolutely no idea who I am anymore. But! I have just done a major purge of my woefully ill-kept Slate inbox--I actually left the magazine last week--and saw this message. I was in the middle of a longish leave from Slate when you sent it, and this must have gotten buried in the post-leave, post-holiday deluge. 

In any case, I thought I'd write back, after all these months, and offer a belated thanks for your readership, an apology for the non-response, and best wishes for whatever lies ahead for you. I hope you keep writing!

all my best,
Nina

 I had completely forgotten about all of this when I receive the email, but I am now considering reopening this blog but obviously changing the direction from an old assignment to possibly crafts and other creative things that interest me.  Who knows if I will be able to find the time to do this, but if I do it could be fun.

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Contacting my OP-ED writer

I have yet to hear back from my writer although that is understandable with the business of the holiday season.  Contacting my writer was a bit of a daunting task for me as I am typically a shy person.

Here is a copy of the email I sent:
Dear Ms. Rastogi,
   Hello! My name is Rebecca Quill and I am a senior at Roncalli High School in Indianapolis, Indiana.  In my AP Lang & Comp class, we are following writers and blogging about their work.  I have been following you and your contributions to the Green Lantern for the Slate.  Our most recent assignment was to blog about an argument presented in a recent piece.  I chose your Green Lantern piece responding to the question: how is it possible to waste water when it's constantly being recycled through evaporation and rain? http://www.slate.com/id/2268920/ In response to the last assignment, the next one was to contact our writer.  I was wondering if you know of any relating issues or could provide me with additional examples relating to water conservation.  In addition, are there any favorite articles of yours that include conserving water or other ways to live green?
Thank you for your time and have a happy holiday season,
Rebecca Quill
 
I intend to update my post if I recieve a response, but until then Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!!

Water, Water Everywhere

Nina Shen Rastogi answers the question; if water is continuously recycled, then how can we waste it?
http://www.slate.com/id/2268920/
Published Oct. 5, 2010 on the Slate magazine, this article addresses the multiple factors that go into water comming out of your indoor plumbing.

CLAIM: Water shortages are really a problem of distribution. We may have enough freshwater on Earth to meet the global population's current needs, but we can't always make it available where it's needed, when it's needed, and in the quality in which it's needed.

3 support points:
1) You can think of a community's water supply as a bank balance: If the community takes out more than can be returned in a timely fashion, it may reach a point at which it doesn't have enough water to grow crops, wash clothes, or flush toilets.
2) Not all water use is equal; depending on the source from which a community take its water, certain water involved actions and activities consume water completely and others return water back to the watershed.
  • Some communities take their water from local rivers and stream and then treat and return the used water to the same rivers and streams.
  • For these communities, water from activities like showering and such is recycled and returned to the local watershed.
  • Also water from activities like watering the lawn and washing the car is lost although eventually returned in precipitation.
  • Some other communities take their water from the ground; the water from ground aquifers takes years to replenish.
  • For these communities, all water is consumed/lost.
3)For every gallon of tap water you use, your utility company has to extract it, clean it, pump it to your house, pump it back out, reclean it, and eventually discharge it.
  • supplying a Northern Californian with potable tap water and then treating that water after it spirals down the drain requires about 0.4 kilowatt-hours of electricity per day.

CONCESSION: Thanks to the hydrologic cycle, we drink and bathe in the same H2O that rained on the dinosaurs. And, theoretically, at least, the Earth has more than enough for all of us: According to Brian Richter, co-director of the Nature Conservancy's Global Freshwater Program, human activities—agriculture, manufacturing, bathing, drinking, and so on—consume only about 10 percent of the planet's available freshwater supply.

I fully agree with Ms. Nina Shen Rastogi; I believe water should be conserved because it is connected with other energy consumption.  I checked Indianapolis Water to see where my water is comming from.  Indianapolis uses a combination of water from rivers, creeks, streams, and reseviors along with wells and groundwater.  This made me wonder whether there was a way to aid our local water treatment plants in being aware of what we are adding to our water supply.  Chemicals in cleaners and other things that go down our drains may be introduced to our local rivers and streams.

Monday, November 22, 2010

Street Vendors vs. Restaurants for a Greener Lunch

For individuals who live and work in large busy cities, living green can be a bit more difficult. While the amount of driving and car emissions is cut down, other footprints show up. One may wonder if the quick and easy street vendor with it's CO2 generator is really the best choice. There are a couple of things to consider. One is the generator vs. the power plant. Generators are generally dirtier and may release more greenhouse gases, but restaurants use energy 24/7. Secondly, the trucks must move to and from the central location to unload and dump waste water and oil, etc. Restaurants advantage on this point might be outweighed by the fact that they use energy 24/7. Trucks although they may put out more emissions, are in use for less time and generally stay in one place. This means that the emissions from driving the truck around are not a huge factor. They also reduce the number of emissions from customers. If a street vendor serves 100+ customers a day that would otherwise drive to a restaurant, then that may give them an edge. The green conscience individual must always remember that packing one's own lunch from home is the greenest choice. Eating leftovers from the previous night's meal reduces waste and extra energy use. Also using one's own utensils that can be washed and used again is always better than throwing plastic ones away. Eating a green lunch can have many options. Which one will you choose?

http://www.slate.com/id/2272476/ 

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Nina Shen Rastogi